In a tremendous shift that is affecting all financial markets, Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs) are currently in the process of being replaced (for example USD LIBOR, GBP LIBOR, EUR LIBOR, EONIA) or reformed (EURIBOR). IBORs, the most important of which has long been LIBOR (the London Interbank Offered Rate), are interest rate benchmarks that designate unsecured funding rates between banks in the market. For more than 30 years, they have been used by financial institutions, as well as financial market participants (such as institutional investors and corporations), as a reference interest rate for transactions like interest rate swaps, bonds and loans.
The balance of financial contracts that refer to LIBOR alone is enormous (approximately US$350 trillion). Because used benchmark rates have to comply with the EU-BMR as of 1 January 2020 (critical benchmarks and third country benchmarks as of 1 January 2022), this has a significant impact on a wide range of corporate activities and stakeholders in the financial market.
Financial professionals are to manage the transition of the IBORs in parallel with the implementation of the EU’s Benchmark Regulation (BMR). These reforms take place as a result of the manipulation scandals that recently shook the indexes, which had until then been regarded as important pillars to the financial sector.
Het volume aan financiële producten dat verwijst naar LIBOR is enorm (naar schatting USD 350 biljoen). Omdat IBORs vervangen of hervormd worden in de periode tot eind 2021, tekent zich nu al een grote impact af op een breed scala bedrijfsactiviteiten en belanghebbenden in de financiële markten.
Financiële instellingen moeten de impact van de transitie van de IBORs managen, naast de implementatie van EU Benchmark Regulation (BMR). Deze IBORs transitie vloeit onder meer voort uit de manipulatie schandalen die de afgelopen jaren in het nieuws gekomen zijn over deze indexen die tot dan toe werden beschouwd als solide pilaren onder het financiële systeem.
Het volume aan financiële producten dat verwijst naar LIBOR is enorm (naar schatting USD 350 biljoen). Omdat IBORs vervangen of hervormd worden in de periode tot eind 2021, tekent zich nu al een grote impact af op een breed scala bedrijfsactiviteiten en belanghebbenden in de financiële markten.
Financiële instellingen moeten de impact van de transitie van de IBORs managen, naast de implementatie van EU Benchmark Regulation (BMR). Deze IBORs transitie vloeit onder meer voort uit de manipulatie schandalen die de afgelopen jaren in het nieuws gekomen zijn over deze indexen die tot dan toe werden beschouwd als solide pilaren onder het financiële systeem.
Het volume aan financiële producten dat verwijst naar LIBOR is enorm (naar schatting USD 350 biljoen). Omdat IBORs vervangen of hervormd worden in de periode tot eind 2021, tekent zich nu al een grote impact af op een breed scala bedrijfsactiviteiten en belanghebbenden in de financiële markten.
Financiële instellingen moeten de impact van de transitie van de IBORs managen, naast de implementatie van EU Benchmark Regulation (BMR). Deze IBORs transitie vloeit onder meer voort uit de manipulatie schandalen die de afgelopen jaren in het nieuws gekomen zijn over deze indexen die tot dan toe werden beschouwd als solide pilaren onder het financiële systeem.
In the future, only benchmark rates that comply with the EU-BMR are allowed to use in new contracts. Next to that, they will trigger necessary changes in for example risk models. Global factors driving the transition are among others:
Adjustments of these benchmark rates will have significant consequences for business operations, customer interactions, control processes, systems & software, risk management (modelling), accounting and financial performance. It is necessary to deploy active and timely preparations to ensure readiness for the transition to new benchmarks.
There are vast challenges linked to the IBORs transition - from identifying the scope of contracts that refer to the current benchmark rates to updating these contracts and potentially renegotiating them with your clients and counterparties. Uncertainty remains regarding the termstructure for new benchmarks (e.g. 1, 3, 6 and 12- month rates), with markets still needing to develop in this aspect. Also beyond the legal, contractual and conduct risk matters at hand, financial institutions will also have to change their internal processes and the adoption of new rates will trigger valuation adjustments in management reporting and annual accounts. Finally, new products, with pricing adapted to alternative benchmarks, will have to be developed. Communication with customers about these changes will be fundamental, especially given the current environment of distrust of financial institutions.
Companies with a transition plan differentiated to include product types, linkage to IBORs, maturies, transition risk assessments, scenario analysis and clear milestones are considered best practice in the preparation for the transition. By participating in working groups, round tables and by acting on best practices insights and guidance from regulators and oversight bodies, financial institutions and financial market participants will be able to keep up with the transition and will have a head start in the new environment.
The IBORs transition will affect companies in multiple industries. Given that the pricing of many financial instruments is tied to an IBOR, upcoming changes could have considerable implications for financial management. To meet the deadlines, treasurers will need to carry out an evaluation and impact analysis of transition risks, create a roadmap and timeline, assess implementation costs, and look at areas such as contract management and documentation. It will also be crucial to assess what will happen to swaps and other instruments used in covering interest rate risks when the benchmarks they are based on cease to exist or are reformed. Furthermore, can contract fallback provisions be trusted to cover transition risks, especially legal or conduct risks?
If you are the CFO or the treasurer of a financial institution or another company, the time has come to ask yourself a series of questions: Have you assigned the responsibility of identifying your group's exposure to contracts linked to an IBOR to someone in your team? Do you know the (effects of the) fallback provisions that will be implemented in case your group does not adjust all contracts on time? Will your company enter into new contracts based on a given IBOR, even knowing that the index will disappear in 2021? Do you know the average difference between €STR and Eonia, or between SOFR and USD-LIBOR? Do you have enough information and data to renegotiate your contracts on advantageous terms?
Within the IBORs-transition, institutions and countries are preparing themselves for the different benchmarks. PwC’s IBOR and reference rate reform specialists across the globe can help you assess, prepare and execute reforms linked to the transition.
We have the experience required to carry out, coordinate and formalise both qualitative and quantitative impact analyses that include valuation and hedging in your portfolios – similar to the requirements in to various ‘Dear CEO’ letters. Or we could review your own efforts (completeness)if you are doing the reform internally.